ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
16S rRNA gene sequencing-based preliminary study on the differences in the microbiota between children with rampant caries and those with arrested caries.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In clinical practice, arrested caries (AC) poses less harm to children than rampant caries (RC), as the development of caries is arrested. However, there is limited research on the microbiology of the two types of caries. This research study the differences in microbial profiles among AC, caries-free (CF)and RC patients. Methods: Thirty-six children aged 3-5 years were selected, grouped into AC, CF, and RC groups, with 12 children in each group. A total of 72 samples, including non-stimulated saliva and dental plaque, were collected. Microbial DNA was extracted, and the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatics analysis was performed with QIIME2, and taxonomic classification was based on the SILVA database. Alpha and beta diversity were assessed, and the Kruskal-Wallis test (with Benjamini-Hochberg correction) was used to identify taxonomic abundance differences. Results: The α-diversity in plaque was significantly lower than in saliva. While the salivary microbiome showed minimal variation across different caries states, the plaque microbiome displayed distinct structural differences. At the taxonomic level, Bacteroidota and Conclusion: This study suggests that different caries statuses are linked to distinct microbial profiles in dental plaque. The analysis revealed clear differences in microbial community structures across the three clinical groups, highlighting a potential connection between caries activity and plaque dysbiosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.