ReviewCureus2026
From Black Box to Clear Insight: A Systematic Review of Human and Porcine Splenic Ex Vivo Perfusion Models.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of ex vivo perfusion models has significantly advanced our understanding of organ function, facilitating research into various health conditions. This review examines the use of porcine and human splenic ex vivo perfusion models and their contributions to biomedical research. We conducted a systematic literature review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts to select studies on human and porcine spleen ex vivo perfusion models that met our inclusion criteria. Nineteen studies using normothermic ex vivo perfusion on porcine spleens with different perfusion durations were reviewed. These studies demonstrated the adaptability and utility of these models in biomedical research. The earliest use of this model dates to 1966, with significant advancements over time. This progress has established the model as a crucial tool for studying bacterial pathogenesis. Both models have greatly enhanced our understanding of previously unknown mechanisms in haematology, parasitology, and microbiology. Currently, only two centres use the human splenic ex vivo perfusion model, with studies lasting up to six hours. Extending this duration could broaden the research scope, especially in microbiology and clinical immunology. Expanding the model's use could reduce reliance on animal models, aligning with the principles of the 3Rs: replacement, reduction, and refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.