ReviewCureus2026
Human Embalming Techniques With Organ Preservation: An Update and Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present review focuses on the importance of modern embalming techniques for human cadaveric preservation, comparing recent innovations with other methods and their historical evolution. Early approaches to human embalming for medical purposes presented significant limitations. During the past century, formaldehyde became widely adopted due to its low cost and high preservation efficiency. However, its use has been progressively restricted in modern laboratories because of the considerable health risks to professionals and its limitations in maintaining the organic properties of tissues. Consequently, more recent alternative preservation methods have been increasingly explored and considered within contemporary anatomical practice. We performed a thorough literature review in search of the best alternatives to formaldehyde for human cadaveric conservation with histological preservation. Eight of the recent studies under analysis propose ameliorations of older techniques, while others enhance the performance of original innovations in embalming techniques. The results show that none of these innovations demonstrates complete efficiency to substitute formaldehyde. It is, therefore, urgent to develop new alternative embalming techniques that are able to preserve the histologic integrity of human cadaveric material while preserving the biosafety of professional handlers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.