Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078289›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Human Embalming Techniques With Organ Preservation: An Update and Literature Review.

Edivaldo X Silva Júnior, Maria A Bettencourt-Pires, Livia C França Silva, Anna L Morais Silva, Vitoria C De Souza, Valentina B Vassilenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edivaldo X Silva JúniorLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPHYS), NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, PRT.
Maria A Bettencourt-PiresDepartment of Anatomy, NOVA Medical School (NMS), NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, PRT.
Livia C França SilvaHuman Anatomy Teaching and Research Laboratory (LABEPAH), University of Pernambuco, Petrolina, BRA.
Anna L Morais SilvaHuman Anatomy Teaching and Research Laboratory (LABEPAH), University of Pernambuco, Petrolina, BRA.
Vitoria C De SouzaHuman Anatomy Teaching and Research Laboratory (LABEPAH), University of Pernambuco, Petrolina, BRA.
Valentina B VassilenkoLaboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPHYS), NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review focuses on the importance of modern embalming techniques for human cadaveric preservation, comparing recent innovations with other methods and their historical evolution. Early approaches to human embalming for medical purposes presented significant limitations. During the past century, formaldehyde became widely adopted due to its low cost and high preservation efficiency. However, its use has been progressively restricted in modern laboratories because of the considerable health risks to professionals and its limitations in maintaining the organic properties of tissues. Consequently, more recent alternative preservation methods have been increasingly explored and considered within contemporary anatomical practice. We performed a thorough literature review in search of the best alternatives to formaldehyde for human cadaveric conservation with histological preservation. Eight of the recent studies under analysis propose ameliorations of older techniques, while others enhance the performance of original innovations in embalming techniques. The results show that none of these innovations demonstrates complete efficiency to substitute formaldehyde. It is, therefore, urgent to develop new alternative embalming techniques that are able to preserve the histologic integrity of human cadaveric material while preserving the biosafety of professional handlers.

Indexed as

cadaverembalminghemodynamicshistologyinstillationperfusionpreservation

Identifiers

PMID42078289
PMCPMC13134474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.