ReviewCureus2026
Pain Management Strategies in Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Clinical Approaches and Public Health Implications.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain management is a fundamental aspect of pediatric dentistry (PD), as children's dental experiences are closely linked to pain perception, anxiety, and subsequent oral health behaviors. Although numerous pharmacological, behavioral, and technology-assisted strategies have been explored, uncertainty persists regarding their combined effectiveness and wider public health relevance. This systematic review synthesized current evidence on pain management strategies in PD and evaluated clinical outcomes alongside implications for access, equity, and quality of care. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published between 2015 and 2025. Randomized controlled trials and observational comparative studies involving children aged zero to 18 years and reporting pain, anxiety, behavioral, or treatment acceptance outcomes during dental procedures were included following the PRISMA guidelines. After screening and eligibility assessment, 11 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The evidence indicates that pharmacological interventions such as local anesthesia and sedation remain effective for controlling procedural pain, particularly during invasive treatments, while nonpharmacological and technology-assisted approaches reduce anxiety and improve cooperation. Multimodal strategies consistently demonstrated superior outcomes compared with single interventions. These findings highlight implications for patient-centered care, improved treatment acceptance, and reduced fear-related avoidance of dental services, particularly among vulnerable pediatric populations globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.