ReviewCureus2026
Integrated Curriculum Enhancing Anatomical Publications at Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrated medical curricula have gained increasing attention within anatomical sciences education for their potential to enhance early clinical reasoning and promote scholarly productivity. Since its implementation in 2022, the Integrated Medical Education Curriculum at the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine (GCSOM), Pennsylvania, has demonstrated notable success, particularly in enabling first- and second-year students (2023-2025) to contribute to peer-reviewed publications in anatomical sciences. The curriculum incorporates horizontal and vertical integration of anatomy, physiology, pathology, pharmacology, and radiology, supported by experiential learning through cadaveric dissection, ultrasound-based anatomy, virtual microscopy, standardized patient encounters, and early physician collaboration. This study systematically reviews peer-reviewed publications authored by pre-clinical medical students enrolled in the integrated curriculum between 2023 and 2025. The analysis examines how interdisciplinary instruction, mentorship from anatomists and clinical faculty, and structured research opportunities empowered students to generate publishable anatomical and clinical observations. Individual curricular components were evaluated for their contributions to students' skills in anatomical interpretation, clinical correlation, and scholarly dissemination. By the end of the second year, students demonstrated advanced integration of structural and functional anatomy with clinical findings. Their publications reflected competencies in identifying anatomical variants, correlating cadaveric findings with surgical procedures, and recognizing pathological conditions through imaging and dissection. These outcomes highlight the curriculum's effectiveness in promoting early scholarly engagement. The GCSOM integrated curriculum significantly enhances anatomical comprehension and clinical correlation during the pre-clinical years. Through multidisciplinary mentorship and research-embedded learning, students acquire the analytical skills and confidence necessary to publish early in their medical training. These findings support integrated curricula as a powerful model for advancing anatomical scholarship among early-stage learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.