Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078233›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Managing Abnormal Uterine Bleeding With Norethisterone Acetate: An Evidence-Based Review and Expert Insights.

Hema Divakar, Manjula Anagani, Parikshit Tank, Sukanta Misra, Jayam Kannan, Girija Wagh, Mitra Saxena, Farendra Bhardwaj, Jayita Chakrabarti, Onkar C Swami and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hema DivakarObstetrics and Gynaecology, Divakars Specialty Hospital, Bengaluru, IND.
Manjula AnaganiWoman and Child Institute, CARE Hospitals, Hyderabad, IND.
Parikshit TankObstetrics and Gynaecology, Ashwini Maternity and Surgical Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Sukanta MisraGynaecology, Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences, Ramakrishna Mission Seva Pratishthan, Kolkata, IND.
Jayam KannanObstetrics and Gynaecology, Garbba Rakshambigai Fertility Centre (GFC) India, Chennai, IND.
Girija WaghObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, IND.
Mitra SaxenaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri Ashwini Saxena Hospital, Rewari, IND.
Farendra BhardwajObstetrics and Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, IND.
Jayita ChakrabartiObstetrics and Gynaecology, Manipal Hospital, Salt Lake, Kolkata, IND.
Onkar C SwamiMedical Services, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, IND.
Kamal KumarMedical Services, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, IND.
Neeraj KumarMedical Services, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a commonly presented gynaecological disorder that significantly affects the physical, emotional, and social well-being of a woman. Norethisterone acetate (NETA), a synthetic progestin, is widely utilized for managing AUB in view of its proven efficacy and favourable safety profile. Despite its extensive use, optimal dosing, duration, and patient-specific considerations in Indian women remain undefined. This expert opinion employed a two-pronged approach to assess the role of NETA in managing AUB in India. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess the evidence on efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and formulation benefits, followed by four expert advisory board meetings held across India involving nearly 50 practicing experts. During expert advisory meetings, the current literature was discussed, and expert opinions were developed. The findings suggest that NETA is an effective option for stabilizing abnormal uterine bleeding, particularly during perimenopause, offering rapid symptom control, and well-tolerated and high patient satisfaction across multiple indications, including heavy menstrual bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, and adenomyosis. Controlled-release formulations of NETA demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence to immediate-release regimens and comparable efficacy with the added advantage of improved adherence. Experts highlighted the importance of individualized dosing based on patient characteristics, such as body mass index, bleeding severity, and comorbidities.

Indexed as

abnormal uterine bleedingcontrolled-release formulationsexpert consensusexpert opinionnorethisterone acetate

Identifiers

PMID42078233
PMCPMC13133744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.