ReviewCureus2026
Managing Abnormal Uterine Bleeding With Norethisterone Acetate: An Evidence-Based Review and Expert Insights.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a commonly presented gynaecological disorder that significantly affects the physical, emotional, and social well-being of a woman. Norethisterone acetate (NETA), a synthetic progestin, is widely utilized for managing AUB in view of its proven efficacy and favourable safety profile. Despite its extensive use, optimal dosing, duration, and patient-specific considerations in Indian women remain undefined. This expert opinion employed a two-pronged approach to assess the role of NETA in managing AUB in India. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to assess the evidence on efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and formulation benefits, followed by four expert advisory board meetings held across India involving nearly 50 practicing experts. During expert advisory meetings, the current literature was discussed, and expert opinions were developed. The findings suggest that NETA is an effective option for stabilizing abnormal uterine bleeding, particularly during perimenopause, offering rapid symptom control, and well-tolerated and high patient satisfaction across multiple indications, including heavy menstrual bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, and adenomyosis. Controlled-release formulations of NETA demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence to immediate-release regimens and comparable efficacy with the added advantage of improved adherence. Experts highlighted the importance of individualized dosing based on patient characteristics, such as body mass index, bleeding severity, and comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.