ArticleCureus2026
Mepolizumab as a Possible Treatment for Eosinophilic Ureteritis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic ureteritis (EU) is a rare inflammatory condition characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the ureter, often presenting with flank pain, hematuria, or obstructive uropathy. Fewer than 30 cases have been reported in the literature, and no standardized treatment strategy currently exists. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman with a history of eosinophilic cystitis who developed progressive left-sided flank pain and hydronephrosis following radical cystectomy. Ureteroscopy with biopsy confirmed EU. A six-week course of corticosteroids resulted in partial radiographic improvement but persistent eosinophilic infiltration on repeat biopsy. Given ongoing biopsy-proven eosinophilic inflammation despite corticosteroid therapy, a multidisciplinary discussion between urology and rheumatology led to initiation of mepolizumab (300 mg administered as three 100-mg subcutaneous injections every four weeks) to target IL-5-mediated eosinophilic inflammation. Following initiation of therapy, the patient experienced progressive clinical improvement, with symptom relief beginning approximately three months after treatment initiation. Repeat imaging demonstrated decreased ureteral inflammation, and follow-up ureteral biopsy showed complete absence of eosinophils, consistent with remission of active disease. The patient has remained clinically stable for approximately 18 months of follow-up without the need for ureteral stenting or additional surgical intervention. This case suggests a potential therapeutic role for IL-5 pathway inhibition with mepolizumab in EU and highlights the biologic rationale for targeting eosinophil-mediated inflammation in this condition. However, because this report describes a single patient and off-label biologic therapy, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further investigation through additional case series, prospective studies, and rare-disease registries will be necessary to better define the role of IL-5-targeted therapies in EU, with potential for future clinical trials if sufficient evidence emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.