ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a telemedicine network for acute neurological care in northeast Germany (ANNOTeM).
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Expert neurological care in rural areas remains a major challenge and contributes to disparities in outcomes after acute neurological emergencies. To address this gap, the ANNOTeM project established a comprehensive, digitally enabled "hub-and-spoke" telemedicine network connecting academic neurology centers with regional hospitals in northeast Germany, providing 24/7 remote expertise, standardized operating procedures, and digital quality management. Methods: This prospective pre and post implementation study used statutory health insurance claims to compare patient outcomes and costs for acute neurological emergencies across 11 ANNOTeM network hospitals vs. 11 matched non-network hospitals (all hospitals were localized in rural regions). The analysis included all consecutively hospitalized adults with ICD-10 coded acute neurological disorders. The primary clinical endpoint was the composite of 90-day mortality, new need for outpatient or nursing home care. Health economic evaluation included direct medical, non-medical, and indirect costs from the insurer's perspective. Results: Following network implementation, the rate of the primary outcome decreased in ANNOTeM hospitals (33.8% vs. 35.9%; unadjusted absolute difference: -2.1%; adjusted absolute difference: -3.2%; aHR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79-0.99), with no improvement in control hospitals (40.7% vs. 42.5%; aHR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.85-1.15). Mean 90-day total costs per patient rose modestly from €11,938 to €12,252 (+2.6%, non-significant). Non-network hospitals showed a similar non-significant cost increase. The cost per avoided adverse composite outcome was €14,968 (unadjusted). Conclusion: Implementing a digitally integrated teleneurology network was associated with improved patient outcomes without substantial increases in per-patient costs. These results support the economic sustainability and transformative potential of innovative, network-based telemedicine systems for acute neurological care in underserved, rural regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.