ArticleCureus2026
From Spreadsheet To Prediction Tool: A Practical Artificial Intelligence Guide For Urologists.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming urological practice; however, most clinicians lack the technical background required to develop, evaluate, or critically appraise predictive models. Existing resources are often written by data scientists for a technical audience, highlighting the need for a practical, clinician-oriented framework that enables urologists to build and deploy meaningful AI tools using data they already possess. Following an overview of the AI landscape in urology, we present a structured nine-part framework that includes clinical data appraisal; data cleaning and variable engineering; model selection (e.g., logistic regression, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Cox regression); train-test splitting; cross-validation; performance evaluation (including area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis); AI-assisted coding using platforms such as Google Colab and large language models (LLMs); web application deployment (e.g., Hugging Face, Gradio, GitHub, Render, and Google Cloud); manuscript preparation aligned with Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis-Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD-AI) reporting standards; and ethical considerations for responsible AI deployment. Each component is illustrated with real-world examples and supported by validated prompt templates. Applying this framework to a high-risk prostate cancer cohort, the lead author, without prior programming experience, successfully developed and publicly deployed a validated multi-outcome prediction tool within 72 hours using entirely free, open-source infrastructure. AI-based clinical prediction tools are increasingly accessible to urologists with structured datasets and a systematic approach. This guide aims to democratize AI model development by enabling clinicians to extract actionable insights from existing data, build validated tools, and contribute meaningfully to the evolving landscape of AI-driven urological care, without the need to write code from scratch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.