Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078138›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Chitinase genes in olive tree (

Catarina Campos, André Albuquerque, Maria do Rosário Félix, Hélia Cardoso, Dariusz Grzebelus, Lénia Rodrigues, Mariana Patanita, Joana Amaro Ribeiro, Augusto Peixe, Maria Doroteia Campos

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catarina CamposMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
André AlbuquerqueMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Maria do Rosário FélixMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Hélia CardosoMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Departamento de Biologia, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Dariusz GrzebelusDepartment of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.
Lénia RodriguesMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Mariana PatanitaMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Joana Amaro RibeiroMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Augusto PeixeMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Maria Doroteia CamposMED Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) are glycosyl hydrolases (GH) that break down glycosidic bonds in chitin. Plant chitinases are known to be implicated in responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, and particularly to defense against fungal pathogens by degrading fungal chitin. Olive tree ( Results: A total of 28 chitinase genes and 5 chitinase-like genes (belonging to narbonin and SI-CPL domains) were found in the olive tree genome. Phylogenetic analysis clustered Conclusions: Collectively, our study improved knowledge on the olive tree chitinase gene family, thus providing a valuable foundation for future strategies aimed at improving fungal disease resistance in olive tree.

Indexed as

chitinasesfungal infection responsegene familyOlea europaea L.regulatory elements

Identifiers

PMID42078138
PMCPMC13132863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.