ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Wide-narrow row spacing reduces mechanical harvest losses in rice by optimizing panicle distribution: evidence from five-year field trials integrating density and cultivar variables.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to establish a mechanized rice production technique that simultaneously increases grain yield and reduces harvest loss. Methods: Large-scale field trials were conducted comparing two planting methods, the traditional farmers' equal-row spacing method (FM) and the wide-narrow row spacing method (WNM), and investigated their effects on yield, yield components, plant uniformity at maturity, mechanical harvest loss, and varietal performance. Results: The results demonstrate that WNM enhances yield through two complementary mechanisms. First, it significantly increases the number of productive panicles per unit area, with the high-yield cultivar Lijiang 419 exhibiting a greater response (average yield increasing of 5.5%). Second, WNM markedly reduces mechanical harvest loss by decreasing panicle dropping. The wider row spacing of WNM (36 cm vs. 30 cm in FM) provides larger corridors for the combine header, minimizing incidental contact with adjacent plants and thereby reducing dropped panicles. Additionally, WNM improves panicle neck height uniformity by 4.7-5.0%, ensuring that more panicles are positioned above the cutting height and further mitigating losses. Conclusion: Consequently, the integration of optimized agronomic practices (WNM) with suitable machinery effectively boosts both yield and harvest efficiency, making WNM a promising planting pattern for mechanized rice production areas seeking high yield and low loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.