Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078117›Full record

ArticleCancer innovation2026

Rationale and Trial Design of DAWNA-FES Trial: Single-Arm Phase II Study of Endocrine Therapy With Dalpiciclib After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition Based on [

Ru Yao, Yang Qu, Zhixin Hao, Ying Xu, Jiahui Zhang, Jie Lian, Lu Gao, Songjie Shen, Feng Mao, Bo Pan and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05613270 (A Prospective Pilot Study to Explore Performance and Efficacy of 18F-FES PET/CT in ER-positive Breast Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05613270 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective Pilot Study to Explore Performance and Efficacy of 18F-FES PET/CT in ER-positive Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsBreast CancerArms18F-FES PET/CT scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ru YaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-3069
Yang QuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Zhixin HaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Ying XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Jiahui ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Jie LianDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Lu GaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Songjie ShenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Feng MaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Bo PanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-562X
Qiang SunDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Li HuoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.
Yidong ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have become a cornerstone in the first-line management of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer. Despite their clinical efficacy, most patients eventually experience disease progression, and optimal treatment strategies following CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance remain unclear. Emerging evidence suggests that switching endocrine therapy (ET) while continuing cyclin inhibition may provide additional clinical benefit. Dalpiciclib, a selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, in combination with physician-selected ET, represents a potential option in this setting. Concurrently, 16α-[ Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of dalpiciclib plus ET in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients who progressed on prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Forty eligible patients with confirmed metastases and at least one [ Discussion: Beyond evaluating efficacy, this single-center phase II trial will provide practical insight into the feasibility of [ Ethical Approval and Trial Registration: Approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Approval number: K3629); registered at ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT05613270).

Indexed as

16α‐[18F]fluoro‐17β‐estradiolCDK4/6 inhibitorestrogen receptormetastatic breast cancertreatment response

Identifiers

PMID42078117
PMCPMC13129906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.