ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Feasibility, accuracy, and effect of a rapid point-of-care serological test (SeroSelectTB) to identify presumptive pulmonary TB patients for confirmatory testing in Ethiopia, South Africa, and Tanzania: a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04752592 (Evaluation of the Feasibility, Accuracy, and Effect of a Rapid Point-of-Care Serological Triage Test for Active TB), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Feasibility, Accuracy, and Effect of a Rapid Point-of-Care Serological Triage Test for Active TB (SeroSelectTB) in High Burden, HIV-endemic African Settings: a Multi-centre, Parallel-group, Randomised, Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Data Quality and Remote Accessibility in Clinical Trials: A SeroSelectTB Case Study in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and South Africa.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The feasibility, accuracy and effect of a rapid point-of-care serological test, SeroSelectTB, was assessed to identify presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients at primary healthcare facilities in Ethiopia, South Africa, and Tanzania. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial from 2020 through 2025. Adults were recruited at selected healthcare facilities with symptoms suggestive of active pulmonary TB. Eligible participants were randomized to standard-of-care (SOC, routine clinical investigation) or intervention (screening with SeroSelectTB) study arms. Our primary outcome was time-to-treatment initiation, calculated as the time from enrollment to treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using intention-to-treat. This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04752592) on 2 April 2021. Findings: Between September 21, 2021, and June 19, 2025, 9097 presumptive pulmonary TB patients were randomly assigned to the SOC (n = 4545) and intervention (n = 4552) study arms. Pulmonary TB was confirmed in 1087 (11.5%) participants (SOC = 527; Intervention = 560). SeroSelectTB was associated with a shorter time-to-treatment initiation compared to SOC (crude hazard ratio (HR): 1.20; 95% CI: 1.06-1.35). The median time-to-treatment initiation among patients with confirmed TB in South Africa, Ethiopia, and Tanzania was 1, 3 and 3 days in the intervention arm compared to 2, 5, and 6 days in SOC arm, respectively. The SeroSelectTB sensitivity was 75.9% and specificity 49.5% in a high HIV setting, whereas sensitivity and specificity were 68.8% and 76.0% among HIV negative participants, respectively. Interpretation: SeroSelectTB reduces the time-to-treatment initiation for pulmonary TB patients and could be considered for integration into TB testing algorithms at primary healthcare facilities. Rapid tests with a lower than optimal specificity can serve an important role as triage tools when adequate sensitivity is demonstrated. Funding: This project (RIA2018D-2493, SeroSelectTB) is part of the EDCTP2 Programme supported by the European Union with funding from UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). NIHR is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHR Global Health Research portfolio supports high-quality applied health research for the direct and primary benefit of people in low- and middle-income countries, using international development funding from the UK Government. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the EDCTP, NIHR or the UK government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.