Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42078079›Full record

ArticleGreen chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC2026

AuLCA: augmented life cycle assessment for chemical data gaps.

Maximilian G Hoepfner, Dion Jakobs, Lucas F Santos, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maximilian G HoepfnerInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1 8093 Zurich Switzerland gonzalo.guillen.gosalbez@chem.ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1622-3304
Dion JakobsInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1 8093 Zurich Switzerland gonzalo.guillen.gosalbez@chem.ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1994-9780
Lucas F SantosInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1 8093 Zurich Switzerland gonzalo.guillen.gosalbez@chem.ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5931-4272
Gonzalo Guillén-GosálbezInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1 8093 Zurich Switzerland gonzalo.guillen.gosalbez@chem.ethz.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-8473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become the prevalent tool to quantify the impact of chemical processes, yet data gaps remain a major obstacle towards its widespread adoption. Existing LCA databases cover a few thousand, mostly high-production-volume, chemicals; however, fine chemicals are often underrepresented. Here we introduce an augmented LCA (AuLCA) framework based on chemical reaction networks (CRN), mass-based impact propagation, and first principles-based energy estimations to predict the life cycle inventories and impacts of chemicals. By applying AuLCA to four case studies, we find good agreement with commercial data, with the accuracy level depending on the chemical reaction network's size and density. Overall, AuLCA is intended to support sustainable decision-making across chemical scales, particularly in early-stage decisions on chemical reaction pathways selection.

Identifiers

PMID42078079
PMCPMC13132018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.