Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077997›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

On the robustness of truncated negative binomial regression model: application to field epidemiology.

Jiwoong Yu, Chanhee Kim, Jaeseong Oh, An-Shun Tai, Woojoo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiwoong YuDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5434-1036
Chanhee KimInfectious Disease Control Center, Gyeonggi Provincial Government, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jaeseong OhDepartment of Pharmacology, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
An-Shun TaiInstitute of Statistics and Data Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-0188
Woojoo LeeDepartment of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-7045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Truncated count data are often obtained from field investigations conducted for individuals with some health-related symptoms to discover the possible causes of food-borne outbreaks quickly and accurately. This study shows two robust properties of the truncated negative binomial (TNB) model. First, by characterizing the whole set of models leading to the same likelihood function as the TNB model, we find a practical meaning that the TNB model gives reliable inference for the regression coefficients even zero inflation is allowed, but a careful interpretation of the regression coefficients is needed. Second, the TNB model can be derived from the Poisson distribution with the random intercept following a gamma distribution, however, it is difficult to justify the distribution assumption for the random intercept. We find that the TNB model presents robust inference for the slope parameters against a misspecified random effect distribution. With some analytic justifications, our numerical study shows that the empirical coverage based on the TNB model is close to its nominal level, even when the random effect distribution is misspecified. The TNB model is applied to analyze truncated count data from the food-borne outbreak that occurred in South Korea.

Indexed as

62P1092B15misspecified random effect distributionrobustnessTruncated count datatruncated likelihoodtruncated negative binomial

Identifiers

PMID42077997
PMCPMC13134751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.