Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077933›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026

Automatic versus Manual Suturing in Total Laryngectomy: Fistula Incidence, Margin Status, and Operative Time.

José Alberto Fernandes, António Andrade, Pedro Valente, Ricardo Vaz, Diogo Pereira, Helena Silveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Alberto FernandesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-6040-5987
António AndradeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5192-7901
Pedro ValenteDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-1124
Ricardo VazDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8039-5265
Diogo PereiraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7476-456X
Helena SilveiraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-4367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pharyngeal reconstruction is essential after total laryngectomy. Traditionally, manual suturing (MS) is used, but it often involves longer operative times and variable outcomes. Over the years, automatic suturing (AS) has gained attention due to its precision, shorter operative time, and lower complication rates. Objective: To compare AS and MS in patients with laryngeal carcinoma who underwent total laryngectomy, focusing on pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) incidence, operative time, surgical margins, and hospital stay. Methods: A retrospective cohort from 2014 to 2024 at a tertiary center, including 107 patients with laryngeal carcinoma who underwent pharyngeal reconstruction with AS or MS. The suturing choice depended on oncological safety and surgeon preference. Data on demographics, tumor stage, PCF occurrence, hospital stay, and operative time were collected. Results: A total of 53 patients underwent AS, and 54, MS. Most were male subjects (96.2%), with similar ages (63.3 versus 62.3 years; Conclusion: There was a noted association between AS and shorter operative time and a higher observed rate of negative margins in selected cases, without an increase in PCF. These findings should be interpreted in the context of selection bias and anatomical constraints.

Indexed as

automatic suturing; manual suturinglaryngeal carcinomapharyngeal reconstructionpharyngocutaneous fistulatotal laryngectomy

Identifiers

PMID42077933
PMCPMC13132627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.