Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077925›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Advancing Equity-Oriented Nursing Research: Reflections on Integrating Intersectionality with Constructivist Grounded Theory.

Shahin Kassam, Lenora Marcellus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shahin KassamUniversity of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-2404
Lenora MarcellusUniversity of Victoria, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancing our intersectionality-framed program of work, this article positions nursing's social‑justice mandate within grounded theory (GT). We argue that constructivist grounded theory (CGT), while oriented to social justice, requires further development to address inequities faced by people at intersecting social locations. We integrate intersectionality as critical social theory and analytical tool to institute sustained intersectional thinking that heightens attention to power relations, contextual variation, and researcher positionality. Operationally, intersectionality expands core GT methods: memoing becomes a site for documenting assumptions, emotions, and the (in)visibility of structural forces; theoretical sampling is deliberately oriented to heterogeneity; and constant comparison is tuned to systems of racism, sexism, and classism across data sources. Drawing on our intersectionality‑informed CGT study of public health nurses working with refugee‑mothering women, we offer a practical blueprint of insights for equity‑driven GT and outline future congruence with ecofeminism, queer theory, Indigenous gender frameworks, and transfeminism to further strengthen qualitative methodologies and promote health equity.

Indexed as

constructivismgrounded theoryhealth equityintersectionalitynursingsocial justice

Identifiers

PMID42077925
PMCPMC13129291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.