Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077923›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Petrea Taylor, Sue O'Donnell, Kelly Scott-Storey, Jeannie Malcom, Charlene Vincent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petrea TaylorUniversity of New Brunswick, Moncton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5842-3933
Sue O'DonnellUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4011-3419
Kelly Scott-StoreyUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-8060
Jeannie MalcomUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4296-9409
Charlene VincentUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1737-7414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicidal ideation (SI) is interpreted through a biomedical lens across health care systems, framing it as a pathology requiring treatment and leading to approaches aimed at controlling or eliminating these thoughts. Within this dominant medical model, illness treatment and death prevention are prioritized, eclipsing attention to health and well-being. Our previous research shows that women make efforts to improve their health despite living with SI. Using a feminist grounded theory approach, we sought to understand how women with SI manage their health. Data from interviews with 32 Canadian women were analyzed using the constant comparative method, elevating the data to a higher level of abstraction. We found that women with SI manage health by

Indexed as

borderline personality disorderCanadafeminismgrounded theorymental healthsuicidewomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42077923
PMCPMC13129328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.