ArticleUCL open. Environment2026
An interdisciplinary approach to the Loss and Damage fund: exploring potential applications and guiding principles.
Article in UCL open. Environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After decades-long advocacy by low- and middle-income countries, the establishment of a Loss and Damage fund during the Conference of Parties 27 was monumental. The Loss and Damage fund unlocked practical avenues to climate justice. It recognises the responsibilities of rich countries with respect to greenhouse gases that exacerbate climate change and disproportionately impacts vulnerable countries. With the fund still in its infancy, it is crucial to differentiate between types of finance that are suitable for other forms of climate action from finance intended specifically to address loss and damage. We consider potential applications of the funding for different sustainable development issues including water resources, energy, transport, human rights and security for a high-functioning Loss and Damage fund. We also highlight the need for the Loss and Damage finance to be attentive to and be able to redress some of the root causes of vulnerability while providing low- and middle-income economies with the support they need in the face of climatic impacts. We propose four guiding principles towards a high-functioning Loss and Damage fund: consistent contributions, clarity in governance, community-driven solutions and fund allocation, and corruption-free systems. We argue that applying those principles promotes climate justice and human rights, and inclusive fund governance. Being community-driven requires such funding to be reactive to climate events, yet proactive in understanding affected communities' needs so that finance allocated is not just a band-aid solution but a long-term and just solution to climate resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.