Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077824›Full record

ArticleUCL open. Environment2026

An interdisciplinary approach to the Loss and Damage fund: exploring potential applications and guiding principles.

Penlope Yaguma, Simon Chin-Yee, Priti Parikh, Lisa Vanhala, Mark Maslin, Richard G Taylor, Mariam Zaqout, Carole Roberts, Jacqueline McGlade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in UCL open. Environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Penlope YagumaDepartment of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-9389
Simon Chin-YeeDepartment of Political Science, School of Public Policy, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4635-1944
Priti ParikhEngineering for International Development Centre, Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-4190
Lisa VanhalaDepartment of Political Science, School of Public Policy, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4886-0061
Mark MaslinDepartment of Geography, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-3463
Richard G TaylorDepartment of Geography, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9867-8033
Mariam ZaqoutEngineering for International Development Centre, Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-8252
Carole RobertsDepartment of Geography, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-8263
Jacqueline McGladeInstitute for Global Prosperity, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8657-6734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After decades-long advocacy by low- and middle-income countries, the establishment of a Loss and Damage fund during the Conference of Parties 27 was monumental. The Loss and Damage fund unlocked practical avenues to climate justice. It recognises the responsibilities of rich countries with respect to greenhouse gases that exacerbate climate change and disproportionately impacts vulnerable countries. With the fund still in its infancy, it is crucial to differentiate between types of finance that are suitable for other forms of climate action from finance intended specifically to address loss and damage. We consider potential applications of the funding for different sustainable development issues including water resources, energy, transport, human rights and security for a high-functioning Loss and Damage fund. We also highlight the need for the Loss and Damage finance to be attentive to and be able to redress some of the root causes of vulnerability while providing low- and middle-income economies with the support they need in the face of climatic impacts. We propose four guiding principles towards a high-functioning Loss and Damage fund: consistent contributions, clarity in governance, community-driven solutions and fund allocation, and corruption-free systems. We argue that applying those principles promotes climate justice and human rights, and inclusive fund governance. Being community-driven requires such funding to be reactive to climate events, yet proactive in understanding affected communities' needs so that finance allocated is not just a band-aid solution but a long-term and just solution to climate resilience.

Indexed as

climate changeclimate financeclimate justiceinfrastructureLoss and Damage fundwater resources

Identifiers

PMID42077824
PMCPMC13133870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.