ArticleCureus2026
Parturients Vulnerability to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine-Induced Neurotoxicity After Intrathecal Administration: A Series of Four Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal anaesthesia using intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine is widely employed in caesarean sections due to its rapid onset, effective analgesia, and minimal foetal transfer. While generally safe, neurotoxicity following intrathecal bupivacaine is rare. This case series highlights an unusual cluster of neurotoxic events observed exclusively in pregnant patients. Four parturients undergoing lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anaesthesia with 10 mg (2 ml) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine developed neurological complications. Neurological symptoms ranging from headache, nausea, vomiting, altered sensorium to generalized tonic-clonic seizures within two to three hours postoperatively. Two of the parturients required mechanical ventilation due to recurrent seizures and cerebral edema evident on MRI. Supportive management with airway protection, benzodiazepines, anti-edema therapy, and antiepileptics led to full recovery without long-term sequelae. Importantly, no neurotoxicity was reported in non-pregnant patients who were exposed to the same drug batch. The findings suggest a pregnancy-specific vulnerability to intrathecal bupivacaine neurotoxicity. Physiological changes in pregnancy-such as reduced cerebrospinal fluid volume, venous engorgement, hormonal modulation of neuronal excitability, and altered blood-neural barrier permeability-may predispose parturients to enhanced CNS exposure and toxicity, even at standard doses. The clustering of cases linked to a single suspected faulty batch further underscores the need for stringent pharmacovigilance and drug quality assurance. Early recognition, airway management, and supportive therapy are crucial for desired outcomes. Enhanced vigilance, dose optimization, and robust quality control of anaesthetic agents are essential to improve obstetric anaesthesia safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.