ArticleJPRAS open2026
Non-ablative dermis layer targeted dielectric heating for facial rhytid improvement in Asian skin.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low-temperature dielectric-field heating has emerged as a non-ablative modality that selectively engages water-rich dermal and fibro-septal structures while sparing adipose tissue. Operating within a controlled thermal-shock window (∼42-45 °C), the Dermis Layer Targeted Dielectric Heating System (DLTD) -when utilized at low-to-moderate intensity levels-induces reversible collagen recoil and early dermal tightening without high-temperature injury. Although conceptually suited for mid- and lower-face rhytids, clinical data remain limited. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, three-dimensional structural elevation, and safety of a single DLTD session, applied within a low-to-moderate energy range, for improving nasolabial folds and marionette lines in Asian women. Methods: Thirty-two women aged 35-65 years with visible nasolabial folds and marionette lines received one DLTD session delivered at low-to-moderate intensity levels along the midface-to-lower-face axis. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at weeks 4 and 8. Wrinkle severity was assessed using WSRS and the Merz scale, and structural changes were quantified by 3D vector analysis of midface elevation and marionette descent. GAIS ratings were obtained at week 8, and pain and adverse events were documented. Results: WSRS improved from 3.1 to 2.0 (35.5%), and Merz scores from 2.6 to 1.9 (26.9%) at week 8. Three-dimensional analysis showed progressive vertical elevation and improved perioral support, with midface elevation increasing from +0.6 mm to +1.9 mm and marionette descent improving from -0.4 mm to -1.2 mm. At week 8, 95% of investigator and 92% of patient GAIS ratings indicated improvement. Pain was minimal (0.4/10), and no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: A single DLTD session at low-to-moderate intensity produced consistent wrinkle reduction, measurable three-dimensional structural elevation, and high satisfaction with negligible discomfort and no downtime. These findings support DLTD as a promising non-ablative option for mid- and lower-face rejuvenation. Larger controlled studies are needed to establish long-term durability and comparative efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.