Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077638›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Social identity formation among Pride parade participants.

Liya Ai, Chikako Tanimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liya AiDepartment of Gender Studies, Graduate School of Humanities, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Chikako TanimotoDepartment of Gender Studies, Graduate School of Humanities, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the formation of social identity among Pride parade participants. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 individuals who participated in Pride parades in Japan, including 24 identified as LGBT+, 9 as non-LGBT+, and 3 as unspecified. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Findings: The process of social identity formation was categorized into four stages: (1) Belonging to the In-Group, (2) Behaving as an In-Group Member, (3) Recognizing One's Role within the In-Group, and (4) Universalizing the In-Group Identity. In the Belonging stage, participants perceived themselves as the in-group while positioning heteronormative society as the out-group. In the Behaving stage, shared practices such as carrying rainbow flags and chanting reinforced group solidarity. In the Recognizing stage, participants were differentiated into Core and Supporting roles, highlighting internal role differentiation. In the Universalizing stage, participants emphasized attitudinal differences between in-group and out-group while simultaneously expressing a goal of dissolving such boundaries. Discussion: These findings contribute to the application of social identity theory to Pride parade participation by demonstrating how collective action fosters shared identity formation among both LGBT+ and non-LGBT+ participants. The study also identifies a novel in-group-out-group configuration, conceptualized as the in-group within the out-group, and suggests the potential for integrating queer theory, particularly the concept of performativity, with social identity theory.

Indexed as

allyLGBT+Pride marchsocial identitysocial movement

Identifiers

PMID42077638
PMCPMC13128402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.