ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
Social identity formation among Pride parade participants.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examines the formation of social identity among Pride parade participants. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 individuals who participated in Pride parades in Japan, including 24 identified as LGBT+, 9 as non-LGBT+, and 3 as unspecified. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Findings: The process of social identity formation was categorized into four stages: (1) Belonging to the In-Group, (2) Behaving as an In-Group Member, (3) Recognizing One's Role within the In-Group, and (4) Universalizing the In-Group Identity. In the Belonging stage, participants perceived themselves as the in-group while positioning heteronormative society as the out-group. In the Behaving stage, shared practices such as carrying rainbow flags and chanting reinforced group solidarity. In the Recognizing stage, participants were differentiated into Core and Supporting roles, highlighting internal role differentiation. In the Universalizing stage, participants emphasized attitudinal differences between in-group and out-group while simultaneously expressing a goal of dissolving such boundaries. Discussion: These findings contribute to the application of social identity theory to Pride parade participation by demonstrating how collective action fosters shared identity formation among both LGBT+ and non-LGBT+ participants. The study also identifies a novel in-group-out-group configuration, conceptualized as the in-group within the out-group, and suggests the potential for integrating queer theory, particularly the concept of performativity, with social identity theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.