ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Adverse event of ACE inhibitors: A descriptive analysis of FAERS data.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are first-line therapies for hypertension and related cardiovascular and renal conditions. The study aimed to characterize the adverse event profile of ACE inhibitors using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Methods: This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed FAERS reports submitted from January 1, 1979, through March 31, 2025, for nine ACE inhibitors (benazepril, captopril, enalapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, moexipril, quinapril, ramipril, and trandolapril) identified as primary suspect drugs. Extracted variables included patient age, sex, reporter type, and reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize reporting frequencies. Comparisons between subgroups (male vs female, <18 vs ≥18 years, and healthcare professional vs consumer reporters) were conducted using reporting proportions. Reporting proportion ratios (RPRs) were calculated to compare the proportion of specific adverse events between predefined reference categories. As FAERS does not provide denominator data, findings reflect reporting patterns rather than incidence or risk estimates. Results: A total of 124,638 adverse event reports were identified. ADEs were disproportionately higher in adults and elderly patients compared to those <18 years. Males generally reported more ADEs than females, though some drugs showed the opposite trend. Healthcare professionals submitted the majority of reports (pooled RR = 2.22, 95% CI: 2.20-2.25). The most commonly reported ADEs were angioedema, cough, hypotension, and acute kidney injury. Conclusion: ACE inhibitor adverse event profiles vary by drug, patient age, and sex. Adults and elderly patients carry the highest burden of ADEs, though pediatric cases remain clinically relevant for specific agents. These findings support tailored monitoring and risk mitigation strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.