ArticlePain reports2026
The true experts: codeveloping a preventive psychological intervention for postsurgical pain with patients and caregivers.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Approximately 20% of youth undergoing major surgery develop chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). However, preventive interventions for CPSP have yielded mixed results, partly due to the limited involvement of patients and caregivers in the intervention development process. Single-session interventions (SSI) are well-suited in this context, as they are time- and cost-efficient. Objectives: This study investigates the perioperative needs of patients and caregivers, and utilizes these insights to co-develop a preventive psychological SSI for post-surgical pain. Methods: Two rounds of focus groups were conducted with patients and caregivers to (1) gather information on the perioperative experience of patients and caregivers to develop the content of a preventive SSI, and (2) gather feedback on the draft of the intervention. Participants' experiences were analyzed applying structural content analysis. Based on these results, the content of a digital intervention was developed, which was then presented to participants for evaluation, and feedback was analyzed using participatory observation. Results: Five adolescent patients and four mothers took part in the focus groups. In total, 5 superordinate categories were identified: Consequences of context (i.e., contextual components), looking after yourself (i.e., self-care related components), limitations of healthcare system (i.e., healthcare system-based components), requests for medical staff (i.e., specific expectations directed toward providers) and child as primary focus (i.e., child-focused components). The intervention draft was well accepted by participants, and minor suggestions for improvement were implemented. Conclusion: Our study identifies core topics of importance for patients undergoing major surgery and their caregivers, and informs the development of a preventive psychological intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.