ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2026
Finite Element Analysis on the Effect of Activation Time on Cervical Spine Biomechanical Response During Pilot Ejection.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Finite Element Analysis on the Effect of Activation Time on Cervical Spine Biomechanical Response During Pilot Ejection.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate different muscle activation times on the cervical spine biomechanical responses in pilot ejection. A validated C0-T1 cervical spine model, incorporating vertebrae, intervertebral discs, ligaments, and 13 major active muscles, was subjected to simulated ejection conditions of 10G vertical acceleration over 150 ms. Activation times ranging from 26 to 92 ms were analyzed to evaluate their impact on vertebral rotation, disc stress, and injury risk. Results demonstrated that shorter activation times (26-46 ms) reduced excessive flexion at C3-C4 and C4-C5; these earlier muscle engagements enhance spinal stability. Conversely, longer delays (76-92 ms) increased rotational angles at C5-C7, exacerbating hyperflexion-related injury risks. An optimal activation time of approximately 46 ms minimized flexion without inducing compensatory hyperextension, balancing load distribution across cervical segments. These findings emphasize the critical role of neuromuscular response timing in mitigating cervical spine injuries during high-G ejection. The study provides insights for optimizing pilot safety through tailored muscle activation strategies, sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) protective equipment design, and training protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.