ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Combined Therapy With Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Penrose Drainage for Flap Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure ulcers are well recognized, yet severe cases often require surgical closure. However, contaminated wounds and external forces from postoperative positioning can lead to high complication rates, prolonging treatment and increasing burdens on patients, providers, and healthcare costs. Negative pressure wound therapy has traditionally been used for chronic ulcers and traumatic wounds, and recent studies underscore the efficacy of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (INPWT) in reducing postoperative complications. Conventional closed suction drains, however, often lose suction pressure with increased drainage volume, risking clot obstruction. We report a case using a combination of INPWT and Penrose drainage on a flap surgical wound to achieve efficient drainage and favorable outcomes. Between April 2020 and September 2021, 4 cases using INPWT postoperatively following pressure ulcer surgery were evaluated. All 4 patients were women with sacral ulcers, with an average age of 70.3 years (range 43-89 y). Comorbidities included diabetes in 1 patient and a smoking history in another. The average healing time was 14 days (range 12-16 d). Postoperative complications-including hematoma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and flap necrosis-pose risks for ulcer recurrence. Effective management is therefore crucial. Combining INPWT with Penrose drainage enhanced drainage efficiency and promoted wound healing, thereby reducing complications and expediting recovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.