Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077542›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Combined Therapy With Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Penrose Drainage for Flap Surgery.

Chikashi Morikawa, Shinobu Ayabe, Hisashi Motomura

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chikashi MorikawaFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Yao Tokushukai General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Shinobu AyabeFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Yao Tokushukai General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hisashi MotomuraDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure ulcers are well recognized, yet severe cases often require surgical closure. However, contaminated wounds and external forces from postoperative positioning can lead to high complication rates, prolonging treatment and increasing burdens on patients, providers, and healthcare costs. Negative pressure wound therapy has traditionally been used for chronic ulcers and traumatic wounds, and recent studies underscore the efficacy of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (INPWT) in reducing postoperative complications. Conventional closed suction drains, however, often lose suction pressure with increased drainage volume, risking clot obstruction. We report a case using a combination of INPWT and Penrose drainage on a flap surgical wound to achieve efficient drainage and favorable outcomes. Between April 2020 and September 2021, 4 cases using INPWT postoperatively following pressure ulcer surgery were evaluated. All 4 patients were women with sacral ulcers, with an average age of 70.3 years (range 43-89 y). Comorbidities included diabetes in 1 patient and a smoking history in another. The average healing time was 14 days (range 12-16 d). Postoperative complications-including hematoma, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and flap necrosis-pose risks for ulcer recurrence. Effective management is therefore crucial. Combining INPWT with Penrose drainage enhanced drainage efficiency and promoted wound healing, thereby reducing complications and expediting recovery.

Identifiers

PMID42077542
PMCPMC13132285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.