ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Liposuction Followed by Helium Plasma Radiofrequency Versus Liposuction Control: A Retrospective Study Evaluating Patient Satisfaction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liposuction is widely performed for body contouring, but concerns regarding residual sagging and contour irregularities remain as limitations of this technique. Heat-emitting technologies aim to stimulate skin contraction, and radiofrequency (RF) energy is considered effective. However, patient satisfaction is essential to confirm its clinical benefit. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed the outcomes of 113 patients who underwent either conventional liposuction (n = 73) or liposuction followed by helium plasma RF (n = 40) performed by a single surgeon. Objective outcomes, complications, and the BODY-Q questionnaire were used to assess the procedural data and patient satisfaction. Results: In the long-term subgroup, patients treated with helium plasma RF reported significantly higher BODY-Q scores for appraisal of excess skin across all comparisons: full long-term cohort (87.8 versus 73.8), subgroup without abdominoplasty (92.8 versus 64), and subgroup excluding lipoabdominoplasty-only cases (87.8 versus 73.4). Among patients who did not undergo abdominoplasty, satisfaction with the abdominal appearance was also significantly higher (68.8 versus 45). Although satisfaction scores for other regions favored the helium plasma RF group, these differences were not statistically significant. The helium plasma RF group had a lower abdominoplasty rate (30% versus 67.1%), higher aspirated volumes (3357.1 versus 2637.2 mL), and a significantly lower revision rate (12% versus 37.5%). The complication rates were similar between the groups (2.5% versus 2.7%). Conclusions: Liposuction followed by helium plasma RF was associated with favorable patient-reported satisfaction regarding abdominal contour and excess skin, lower revision and abdominoplasty rates, and higher aspirated volumes, with a safety profile comparable to that of conventional liposuction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.