ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Pilot Study: Soft-tissue Healing After Augmented Closure of Traumatic Injuries With Synthetic Electrospun Fiber Matrix.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary closure of traumatic musculoskeletal soft-tissue wounds is often complicated by soft-tissue edema or compromised skin integrity. Tenuous primary skin closure is associated with an increased incidence of major wound complications. The aim of this retrospective case series was to evaluate soft-tissue healing outcomes following incorporation of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM) to provide soft-tissue reinforcement of primary surgical closure of musculoskeletal injuries. Methods: A retrospective medical record review of patients treated at a single trauma site for musculoskeletal injuries requiring surgical intervention was conducted following local institutional review board exemption. Subjects who underwent orthopedic reconstruction with subdermal SEFM placement during primary closure were included. Subject data were collected from surgical intervention with SEFM until the final postoperative follow-up with the surgeon. Data regarding unplanned reoperation, infection, major dehiscence, and time to complete incisional healing were collected and analyzed. Results: Nineteen subjects were identified and included in the analysis. The most common injury cause was open fractures (n = 11), with most injuries occurring in the lower extremity (n = 14). The most common reason for SEFM incorporation during primary closure was to offload tension at the suture line (n = 10). All injuries achieved successful surgical wound healing. The rate of complications requiring reoperation was 1 of 19 patients. Conclusions: Subdermal SEFM incorporation during primary closure resulted in complete soft tissue healing and low rates of major complications. This pilot study indicated that SEFM may be used to achieve primary closure and avoid advanced reconstructive procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.