ArticleJDS communications2026
Rethinking navel size thresholds for omphalitis diagnosis in newborn dairy calves using machine learning.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Omphalitis in newborn calves is an underreported disease with no gold standard diagnostic test. Comprehensive examination is often impractical on farms, and simplified protocols based on the umbilical stump diameter have been proposed. However, existing thresholds relied on expert opinion or limited clinical evidence. The objectives were to (1) assess the reliability of a technique for measuring umbilical stump diameter by evaluating intra- and interobserver agreement; (2) develop a statistical model describing umbilical stump diameter as a function of disease status in Holstein (HO) and Jersey (JE) heifers aged 3 to 10 d; and (3) propose thresholds to estimate farm-level prevalence (optimum sensitivity [Se] and specificity [Sp]) and to identify umbilici with a high probability of omphalitis (maximize Sp). The study enrolled newborn HO and JE heifers from commercial farms in the San Joaquin Valley (California): 157 calves for intraobserver analysis, 44 for interobserver analysis (3 raters), and 667 for threshold estimation. Intra- and interobserver agreement were assessed using the CV and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Because true disease status was unknown, thresholds were derived using an unsupervised machine-learning approach that inferred healthy and diseased subpopulations from the observed data. Thresholds were estimated separately by breed using 2-component Gaussian mixture models under the biological assumptions that (1) stump diameters arise from a mixture of healthy and diseased subpopulations, (2) diseased umbilici are larger on average, (3) diameters within each subpopulation follow a normal or log-normal distribution, and (4) distributions are stable in calves aged 3 to 10 d across herds. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was applied to a simulated sample to estimate diagnostic test performance. Umbilical stump diameter measurements at the external umbilical ring were reliable with good (CV = 5.94% [95% CI: 5.31-6.57]) and fair to good (ICC = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.65-0.85]) agreement for intra- and interobserver agreement, respectively. The breed-specific models accurately described the observed data. Diagnostic tests based on umbilical stump diameter can discriminate between healthy and diseased umbilici (HO area under the curve [AUC] of 0.56 [95% CI: 0.51-0.62]; JE AUC of 0.65 [95% CI: 0.58-0.72]). Thresholds optimizing the Se and Sp trade-off (HO: 16.5 mm; JE: 13.0 mm) achieved high Sp (0.91 and 0.97) but low Se (0.35 and 0.46) for HO and JE. Higher thresholds prioritizing Sp (HO: 19.3 mm; JE: 14.9 mm) yielded Sp ≥0.99, with Se of 0.22 and 0.28. The identified threshold should be interpreted cautiously given the low Se and modest ROC values. Further validation in independent populations and associations with clinical findings are needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.