ArticleJDS communications2026
Facial phenotyping of Holstein calves using pose estimation models with varying keypoints.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly applied in livestock farming and offers valuable tools for monitoring animal health and welfare. Among these, facial expressions have emerged as informative indicators of well-being in animals. In this context, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pose estimation models for extracting facial features in North American Holstein calves. Three YOLOv8-based models were trained using 10, 16, and 30 facial keypoints, and their performance was evaluated using training metrics (loss, precision, recall, F1 score, training time, and number of epochs) and keypoint accuracy measures (object keypoint similarity, average precision, average recall). The 10-keypoint model outperformed the others, requiring less training time, achieving lower loss, and yielding the highest prediction accuracy. This model enabled reliable extraction of facial phenotypes, including nostril distance, eye opening, and ear angles and movements. These findings demonstrate the potential of pose estimation models for automated phenotyping and welfare monitoring in dairy calves.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.