ArticleJDS communications2026
Computing inbreeding coefficients accounting for unknown parents using pedigree-based metafounders.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A modified indirect method for computing inbreeding coefficients.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Missing pedigrees result in underestimated numerator relationship and inbreeding coefficients in a closed population. Recursive algorithms have been proposed to derive nonzero inbreeding coefficients accounting for unknown parents but can be computationally ineffective with a deep pedigree. In this report, we proposed a pedigree-based metafounder (MF) approach to calculate nonzero inbreeding. Unknown parents were assigned to MF based on the birth year of their offspring. The MF were assumed to have self-relationships equaling twice the average inbreeding coefficients of the animals with both parents known and born in the same year. The relationships between 2 MF were set as a function (i.e., minimum, harmonic mean, or maximum) of their self-relationships. Inbreeding coefficients were then computed using Sargolzaei and Iwaisaki's (2004) algorithm modified to account for MF, and the relationship matrix of MF was constructed iteratively until convergence. The algorithm was tested and compared with a recursive algorithm using a pedigree of 8.6 million Japanese Holsteins (average longest ancestral path = 11) and a simulated pedigree with 11,550,500 animals across 40 generations. For the Holstein pedigree, one iteration took ∼300 s with the recursive algorithm and 70 s with the proposed algorithm. If the relationships between MF were assumed to equal the maximum of their self-relationships, both algorithms converged to the same results. Simulation results further confirmed that the maximum assumption yielded the best correlation between the estimated and true inbreeding. The discussion highlights how different assumptions regarding the relationships between MF affect the resulting numerator relationship and inbreeding coefficients. With the MF approach, the subsets of the numerator relationship matrix accounting for unknown parents can also be derived quickly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.