ArticleJDS communications2026
Different approaches to assess extracellular vesicles from bovine colostrum.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EV) are lipid bilayer nanoparticles secreted by most cell types and implicated in intercellular communication, immune regulation, and disease processes. Milk-derived EV, particularly those present in bovine colostrum (BCEV), may play critical roles in neonatal calf development and immunity; however, their characterization remains limited due to methodological challenges in isolating pure vesicle populations. This study aimed to evaluate different methods to detect and characterize BCEV. We isolated BCEV from colostrum of multiparous dairy cows using differential ultracentrifugation and employed complementary analytical techniques to evaluate their morphology, size distribution, and EV-associated markers. Dynamic light scattering indicated an average BCEV diameter of 127.3 ± 9.5 nm, whereas single-particle interferometric reflectance imaging sensing revealed a smaller population of 40- to 45-nm vesicles expressing CD9 and CD63. Transmission electron microscopy further confirmed spherical vesicles averaging 38.7 ± 2 nm, whereas cryogenic electron microscopy visualized intact lipid bilayer structures. These findings demonstrate that BCEV comprise heterogeneous populations detectable by multiple complementary approaches and underscore the importance of combined methodologies for their accurate characterization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.