ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Osteoporotic fractures prediction in Chinese postmenopausal women: a machine learning-based multi-dimensional approach.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporotic fractures are a major complication of osteoporosis and pose a substantial global health burden, particularly in postmenopausal women. Although bone mineral density (BMD) is widely used for fracture risk assessment, its predictive accuracy is limited, and integrating multidimensional clinical indicators may improve risk prediction. This retrospective study included 1,717 postmenopausal women from two tertiary hospitals in Shaanxi Province, China, who were classified into fracture (n=797) and non-fracture (n=920) groups based on a history of low-energy fractures. Thirty-two clinical variables, including BMD, bone turnover markers (BTMs), serum electrolytes, age, and body mass index, were analyzed. Recursive feature elimination was applied, and ten machine learning models were developed using a training dataset (70%) and evaluated on a testing dataset (30%). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Model interpretability was explored using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Among all models, the Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.872), outperforming the Extra Trees (AUC = 0.841) and XGBoost (AUC = 0.836) models. SHAP analysis identified BMD, serum chloride (Cl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.