ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Athletes beyond sex categories: gender inclusivity, law and sport in India.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India's sporting ecosystem remains deeply entrenched in binary classifications of sex, despite the country's long-standing cultural recognition of gender diversity and its progressive constitutional jurisprudence on gender identity. This paper examines India's engagement with transgender, non-binary, and sex-variant athletes, highlighting the disconnect between legal recognition and sporting governance. While landmark judicial decisions such as NALSA vs. Union of India (2014) have affirmed the right to self-determined gender identity and constitutional guarantees of dignity, equality and non-discrimination, these principles have yet to be meaningfully operationalised within Indian sport. Through a socio-legal analysis of prominent Indian case studies of Anaya Banger, Aryan Pasha, Dutee Chand, Shanthi Soundararajan, and Nandini Agasara, the paper illustrates how athletes who fall outside normative sex-based classifications face invasive scrutiny, regulatory exclusion, privacy violations, and social stigma. These cases demonstrate how sports authorities frequently conflate transgender identity with intersex variations and natural biological diversity, resulting in inappropriate eligibility standards and coercive medical practices. The paper situates these experiences within broader international developments, including fragmented global sporting regulations. The analysis further explores India's constitutional framework, statutory protections under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, and relevant international human rights obligations, arguing that the principal barrier to inclusion is not the absence of rights but the failure to implement them within sport-specific governance. The paper concludes by proposing pathways for reform, including the adoption of uniform national guidelines, affirmative support measures, institutional sensitisation, and evidence-based policy design. It argues that inclusive sport is not merely a matter of competitive fairness, but a measure of democratic belonging, dignity, and substantive equality in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.