Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077334›Full record

ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2025

Indications for Keratoplasty in King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital: Five Years of Experience.

Saeed Saleh Alqahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saeed Saleh AlqahtaniDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to describe the indications and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation performed at a tertiary hospital over the past five years. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional chart review was conducted of medical records for keratoplasty cases admitted to the hospital during this period. For each patient, data were collected on demographic characteristics, clinical indications for keratoplasty, associated ocular conditions, the surgical technique used, graft size, postoperative outcomes, suture removal time, and complication rates. Results: A total of 132 patients (159 keratoplasties) were included. The leading indications for keratoplasty were keratoconus (74/159, 46.5%), corneal decompensation including pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (37/159, 23.3%), and microbial keratitis (10/159, 6.3%). Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was the most commonly performed surgical technique (84/159, 53%), followed by Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK, 35/159, 22%). Postoperatively, mean intraocular pressure remained stable (approximately 16-17 mmHg) throughout follow-up visits. By two months, corneal clarity was achieved in nearly 90% of cases, with gradual improvement in visual acuity up to three months. Conclusions: The findings highlight key indications and evolving surgical techniques in corneal transplantation, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis and adoption of less invasive procedures to improve patient outcomes. These insights support targeted clinical strategies and resource planning to optimise corneal transplant care.

Indexed as

corneal transplantationdeep anterior lamellar keratoplastyDescemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplastylamellar keratoplastypenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID42077334
PMCPMC13132138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.