ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Postoperative deep venous thrombosis among patients undergoing neck of femur fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical options for neck of femur fracture (NFF) include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty, HA or total hip arthroplasty, THA). The choice is based on several variables with each modality having distinct advantages and disadvantages. Previous studies have shown that ORIF may be a protective factor in the development of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) compared to arthroplasty. However, there is significant variation in methodology, results and limited follow up. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether ORIF is a protective factor for postoperative DVT compared to arthroplasty with follow up of patients for up to 3 months. Methods: Retrospective chart review study of patients who had NFF, were 60 years or older and underwent surgical intervention between January 2020 and May 2023. Clinical and demographic characteristics were recorded and analyzed. DVT rates were compared between ORIF and arthroplasty. This was repeated for ORIF vs HA vs THA. Results: Among 161 NFF patients, 1 (3.7%) of ORIF patients developed DVT versus 2 (1.44%) of arthroplasty. This difference was not significant, no patients in the THA (n=5) group developed DVT. Conclusion: The number of postop DVT observed was likely underestimated as only symptomatic DVT was assessed, population size was less than expected and the vast majority of patients underwent arthroplasty. Larger, multicenter studies with 3-month follow-up are required to determine whether ORIF may be a protective factor in developing DVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.