ArticleFrontiers in aging2026
Loneliness within couples coping with cancer: prevalence, associations with physical and mental health, and potential benefits of dyadic exercise.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03630354 (EXERCISING TOGETHER © for Couples Coping With Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
EXERCISING TOGETHER © for Couples Coping With Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer survivors and intimate care partners coping with cancer may each experience loneliness that impacts their health, but research within couples and potential benefit of interventions is scarce.
methodsWe added the Cancer Loneliness (CL) scale to measures of anxiety, depressive symptoms, pain and social and physical function mid-way through the Exercising Together trial (NCT03630354) in couples coping with breast (BC; n = 44) or prostate cancer (PC; n = 75). The prevalence of CL scores >1 indicated at least some loneliness and we ran correlations between CL and measures of social, physical and mental health. Within PC couples we explored the potential benefits of different types of dyadic exercise programs (supervised, group partnered exercise, supervised separate groups of survivors or partners, or unsupervised independent exercise) on CL over 6 months. Results: 96% of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and 77% of prostate cancer survivors (PCS) reported CL at baseline. CL was positively associated with anxiety (rho = 0.44, 0.77), depressive symptoms (rho = 0.60, 0.67) and pain (rho = 0.34, 0.23) and inversely associated with social functioning (rho = -0.54, -0.55) among BCS and PCS, respectively (all p < 0.01). CL was inversely associated with physical functioning in BCS (rho = -0.35), but not PCS. Among care partners, 74%-77% of care partners for each BCS and PCS reported CL related to their partner's cancer at baseline. CL was positively associated with anxiety (rho = 0.43, 0.30) and depressive symptoms (rho = 0.62, 0.45) among BC and PC care partners, respectively (all p < 0.01). CL was inversely associated with social functioning in BC partners only (rho = -0.45, p < 0.01), but not with physical functioning in either group. Within PC couples, there was a significant (inverse) interaction between change in CL over six-months of exercise and baseline loneliness. Declines in CL for both PCS and care partners were steepest in the exercise program where they trained with other PCS or care partners. Conclusion: Relationships may not offer enough social support to avoid feelings of loneliness associated with cancer that in turn affects the physical, emotional and social health of each partner. However, exercise may help rebuild connection within the couple and be an avenue for informal social support that together could reduce loneliness. Clinical Trial Registration: [clinicaltrials.gov]: identifier, [NCT03630354].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.