Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Associations between psychological capital, risk tolerance, and satisfaction: a study of Swedish solo self-employed workers.

Hampus Fougner, Claudia Bernhard-Oettel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hampus FougnerSection for Work and Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia Bernhard-OettelSection for Work and Organizational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Solo self-employment is a non-standard work arrangement that can be organized in various ways, such as independent business ownership or gig-by-gig employment through umbrella companies. As this sector expands, understanding the personal resources linked to worker wellbeing is essential. This study utilizes the Conservation of Resources (COR) framework to examine how personal resources regarding psychological capital (hope, self-efficacy, resilience, optimism) and risk tolerance relate to job and life satisfaction. Methods: The study analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 775 Swedish workers, distinguishing between independent business owners ( Results: Results revealed that the relationships with job and life satisfaction were largely consistent across groups. Future-oriented resources, specifically hope and optimism, had the strongest positive associations with both job and life satisfaction. In contrast, self-efficacy and resilience played minor roles when modeled alongside other resources. Furthermore, although business owners reported higher risk tolerance, this attitude was negatively related to life satisfaction, and no significant non-linear (inverted-U) association was found. Discussion: Despite the operational and legal differences between the studied groups, more similarities than differences were found in how personal resources relate to satisfaction outcomes. This suggests that the psychological mechanisms driving wellbeing remain relatively stable across different forms of solo self-employment, regardless of the specific employment form.

Indexed as

business ownersemployed gig workjob satisfactionlife satisfactionpsychological capitalrisk tolerancesolo self-employment

Identifiers

PMID42077302
PMCPMC13134391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.