ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Visual exposure to masked faces benefits personally familiar but not famous face recognition.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The introduction of face masks during the recent COVID-19 pandemic presented a potential challenge for human face perception and recognition. Our exploratory study investigates the effect of face masks in face recognition by probing the neuropsychological mechanisms of the same. We also aim to explicate the effect of general exposure to masked faces and visual experience with specific masked faces of personally familiar individuals on face recognition ability. Methods: Participants detected personally familiar, famous, and unfamiliar Indian faces in masked and unmasked conditions in a 2-back test. Results: Statistical analyses revealed significant main effects of familiarity and mask conditions on performance accuracy and reaction time (RT). The highest performance accuracy in correctly detecting the target face was observed for familiar and unmasked faces, and the lowest for unfamiliar and masked ones. Notably, RTs were not different between unmasked and masked personally familiar faces, while masked famous faces elicited significantly greater RT than their unmasked counterpart. EEG analysis was consistent with behavioral results. Specifically, we show neural evidence for increased effort in processing masked famous faces that is similar to that for masked unfamiliar faces, but absent for masked familiar faces. This increased effort to process masked faces of unfamiliar or famous individuals is suggestive of a beneficial effect of visual exposure to, and experience with, specific masked faces. Conclusion: In sum, our study presents behavioral and neural evidence that personal familiarity with masked faces aids perceptual learning and eventual recognition, and this learning does not generalize to otherwise well-known faces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.