ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Construction of an evaluation index system for user satisfaction with immersive virtual reality exergaming.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in virtual reality technology have given rise to immersive virtual reality exergaming (IVRE), offering new opportunities to increase public physical activity levels and promote the development of recreational sports. This study proposes a systematic evaluation framework for user satisfaction (USAT) during IVRE usage, providing measurement instruments and decision-making support for assessing and improving USAT. We first used a qualitative method called grounded theory to analyze in-depth interviews with users. This helped us identify the key factors that shape their satisfaction. Then, we combined expert opinions with a statistical technique (the G1-CRITIC method) to determine how important each of these factors is. Finally, we tested our framework on eight popular IVRE platforms using a multi-criteria decision-making tool (the VIKOR method) to confirm that it works in practice. The results indicate that the developed USAT evaluation framework comprises five primary indices, fourteen secondary indices, and fifty-seven tertiary indices. Empirical findings demonstrate that the framework exhibits satisfactory reliability and validity. This study provides a methodological and empirical foundation for the design and development of IVRE, with an emphasis on enhancing user experience. Moreover, it extends existing theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches in IVRE research, offering a valuable reference for future related studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.