Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077228›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Evaluation of classical and deep-learning deformable registration for magnetic resonance to four-dimensional computed tomography contour mapping in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Ziad Kheil, Laurent Risser, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal, Soleakhena Ken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ziad KheilUniv Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, CRCT Radopt Team, UMR 1037 INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Laurent RisserUniv Toulouse, Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan MoyalUniv Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, CRCT Radopt Team, UMR 1037 INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Soleakhena KenUniv Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, CRCT Radopt Team, UMR 1037 INSERM, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: : In liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to-four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) contour mapping remains challenging because of cross-modality differences and respiratory motion, motivating fast automated solutions. We comparatively evaluated the clinical practicality of deep learning (DL) based deformable image registration (DIR). Materials and Methods: : This retrospective study included 4D-CT and 3D MRI scans from 170 patients treated with liver SBRT. Segmentations were obtained using open-source automated tools, and test-set labels were clinician reviewed. The dataset was split at the patient level into training/validation/testing sets (122/32/16), an additional 5-fold cross-validation was performed on the training+validation cohort. We compared three approaches: an optimization-based B-spline DIR tool (NiftyReg), a single-network DL model (Direct), and a two-step DL pipeline decomposing multi-modal alignment and intra-4D-CT motion tracking. Statistical analysis used patient-level paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; organ-wise secondary analyses were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR; q=0.05). Results: Classical B-spline DIR achieved the best all-label averages (Dice 0.71 vs 0.62; 95th percentile Hausdorff distance [H95], 17.7 mm vs 21.0 mm). DL achieved its strongest performance on supervised structures compared to all labels (e.g., Dice 0.71 vs 0.62; H95 18.9 mm vs 21.0 mm) while reducing runtime from Conclusion: DL pipelines provided competitive contour-mapping accuracy with orders-of-magnitude runtime gains, but performance depended strongly on the choice of training supervision; classical DIR remained strongest on global all-label metrics.

Indexed as

Deep learningDIRMulti-modal treatment planning

Identifiers

PMID42077228
PMCPMC13129378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.