ReviewAnnals of thoracic medicine
Efficacy of β-agonists in prevention and treatment of acute lung injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The landscape of protein post-translational modifications in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) carry high mortality with limited drug therapies. β-agonists are potential candidates due to bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects. This meta-analysis evaluated their efficacy and safety in ALI/ARDS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of β-agonists in ALI/ARDS were identified through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Relative risks were used for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes. The Cochrane tool was used to evaluate bias, and Cochran's Q and the I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Six RCTs involving 1213 participants met the inclusion criteria. Beta-agonists significantly reduced ventilator-free days (mean difference - 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.21 to - 0.75, P = 0.002, I2 = 68%) and intensive care unit (ICU)-free days (-6.57, P = 0.001). They were associated with nonsignificant trend toward higher 28-day mortality (risk ratio: 1.23, P = 0.10) and a significant increase in 90-day mortality (risk ratio: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.03-1.89, P = 0.03). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robust results, showing increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias (risk ratio: 1.89, P = 0.0008) but no significant effect on organ failure-free days (-0.99, P = 0.31). In ARDS/ALI, β-agonists reduce ventilator-and ICU-free days but increase 90-day mortality and arrhythmia risk, with no impact on organ failure-free days. β-agonists are linked to long-term risks, such as increased mortality and arrhythmias, but they provide little clinical benefit in terms of reducing ventilator or intensive care unit time. They have no effect on the incidence of ARDS/ALI or outcomes of organ failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.