Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077221›Full record

ReviewAnnals of thoracic medicine

Artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility in allergic rhinitis management: Systematic review.

Dana Adel Alrezq, Abdulaziz M Aldaghmani, Jana J Alali, Marwa A Aljowaid, Zahra Abdulaziz Alkhamis, Lamar M Alarqan, Mutrik J Almughni, Hanan A Albalawi, Njood Khalifa Alruwaili, Rayyan M Almusally

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dana Adel AlrezqCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz M AldaghmaniCollege of Medicine, Al Jouf University, Al Jouf, Saudi Arabia.
Jana J AlaliCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Marwa A AljowaidCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Zahra Abdulaziz AlkhamisCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Lamar M AlarqanCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mutrik J AlmughniCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hanan A AlbalawiKing Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Njood Khalifa AlruwailiCollege of Medicine, Al Jouf University, Al Jouf, Saudi Arabia.
Rayyan M AlmusallyDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common outpatient conditions, diagnosed through operator-dependent and resource-intensive methodologies. This systematic review assessed the use and efficacy of diagnostic strategies using artificial intelligence (AI). This review aims to explore how AI can enhance diagnostic accuracy, personalize treatment, and support clinical decisions in AR care. This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between 2002 and 2025. Out of 1109 identified studies, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies involving 311,354 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, mainly from China and South Korea. Supervised machine learning was predominant, followed by Random Forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithms. Overall, AI models demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve up to 0.93, sensitivity 91.5%, specificity 99.95%), which demonstrated a promising utility in diagnosis, risk prediction, and medication adherence. A key finding from this review is that AI models can serve as complementary tools beside gold standard methods. However, clinical adaptation will require external validation, interoperability with electronic health records, a clinicianfriendly design, and adherence to Good Machine Learning Practice. The lack of standardized comparator methods across studies remains a key limitation.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitidesallergic rhinitisartificial intelligencedeep learninghay fevermachine learningnasal allergyneural networkseasonal rhinitis

Identifiers

PMID42077221
PMCPMC13135308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.