Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077154›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2026

Systemic versus local regulation of vitamin D.

Michaela A A Fuchs, Myles Wolf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela A A FuchsJoan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Myles Wolf

Funding

Tissue-Specific Regulation and Effects of CYP24A1R01DK132060 · NIDDK · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MYLES S WOLF · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNew clinical data and technical advances challenge the long-held belief that the kidney is the predominant organ for vitamin D synthesis and degradation. This review highlights recent discoveries in systemic and local vitamin D regulation and their potential to influence future development of novel treatment concepts. RECENT

findingsNew clinical studies of calcifediol supplementation in anephric patients and in chronic kidney disease provide evidence for significant extra-renal vitamin D production. The clinical findings are supported by recent laboratory-based studies that utilize new technologies and mouse models. These studies identify the spleen and other organs as sites of vitamin D production, capable of compensating for a loss of kidney production in mice. The importance of local vitamin D metabolism is further underlined by the finding that secondary hyperparathyroidism in a model of chronic kidney disease could be attenuated by reducing vitamin D inactivation exclusively in the intestines. SUMMARY: Recent tissue-specific investigations of vitamin D metabolism identified several physiologically relevant and potentially targetable tissues beyond the kidney. These findings may provide the basis for novel treatments in kidney disease and other vitamin D-associated disorders with wider therapeutic windows than current approaches that act on the kidneys.

Indexed as

KidneyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyAnimalsHumansHyperparathyroidism, SecondarySpleenVitamin Dchronic kidney diseaseintestinesmineral metabolismsecondary hyperparathyroidismvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID42077154
PMCPMC13292359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.