Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077149›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Waders in a sea of debris: a global overview.

Yada Trapletti-Lanti, Mónica Expósito-Granados, Elizabeth Znidersic, Marga L Rivas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yada Trapletti-LantiBiology Department, Institute of Marine Science INMAR, University of Cadiz, Avenida República Árabe Saharaui s/n, Puerto Real, 11510, Cadiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3005-2396
Mónica Expósito-GranadosBiology Department, Institute of Marine Science INMAR, University of Cadiz, Avenida República Árabe Saharaui s/n, Puerto Real, 11510, Cadiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7996-2469
Elizabeth ZnidersicGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Building 460, Boorooma Street, North Wagga Wagga, 2678, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2804-1731
Marga L RivasBiology Department, Institute of Marine Science INMAR, University of Cadiz, Avenida República Árabe Saharaui s/n, Puerto Real, 11510, Cadiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-3066

Funding

FEDER EU Funds 401LIFE Environmental Governance and Information LIFE20 GIE/FR/000114Postdoctoral Research Contracts of the Andalusian Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of plastic pollution on ecosystems and marine fauna is well documented, although research into its effects on waders (also known as shorebirds) remains limited. Given that waders are exposed to coastal marine litter, this exposure could be a significant factor in the decline of their populations. This study aims to assess the global distribution of plastic ingestion in waders and investigate regional differences in their exposure. Our analysis included 30 studies, examining 316 digestive tracts and 1114 faecal samples. Only four studies analysed plastic in wader nests or entanglements. Eastern Asia exhibited the highest prevalence of plastic ingestion in waders, although no significant differences were detected among coastal regions. Descriptive patterns suggest that this trend may be influenced by intensive industrial activity, high population density, and pollution along migratory flyways. Southern Asia had the highest prevalence of plastics in faecal samples. No statistically significant differences were observed across wader families; however, descriptive results indicated elevated ingestion frequencies in Haematopodidae and Scolopacidae, while Recurvirostridae and Haematopodidae tended to show higher plastic prevalence in faecal samples. This study highlights the need for standardised sampling protocols and continued research on the effects of plastic on wader populations, which could contribute to their conservation.

Indexed as

BirdsPlasticsWaste ProductsAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFecesOceans and SeasPlasticsWaste Productscoastal birdsmacro‐ and microplasticmarine debrisplastic contaminationplastic presence

Identifiers

PMID42077149
PMCPMC13542338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.