Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42077138›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2026

Impact of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs on Postpartum Opioid Prescribing Practices.

Sai Vijay Trilochan Reddy Tadi, CeCe Cheng, Alexander Testa, John J Byrne, Carolina Vivas-Valencia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sai Vijay Trilochan Reddy TadiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1197-593X
CeCe ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-463X
Alexander TestaDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-9115
John J ByrneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Carolina Vivas-ValenciaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4071-5051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association between Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) and postpartum opioid prescribing from 2007 to 2015, prior to the 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention opioid prescribing guidelines, and to assess differences between low- and high-risk populations. STUDY SETTING AND

designThis cross-sectional study captures delivery episodes across the United States, primarily from commercially insured patients. The exposure was the implementation of PDMPs at the state level from 2007 to 2015, with states classified by whether implementation occurred before or after 2016. We used a difference-in-difference design for analysis. The primary outcome included: (1) morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day; (2) pills dispensed; (3) average days' supply, and (4) total number of prescriptions filled during the postpartum period (42 days after delivery). DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: We analyzed secondary data from IQVIA PharMetrics, an administrative claims database from 2006 to 2015. We identified reproductive-age patients (ages 12-59) with a documented delivery and stratified them into low and high-risk groups by postpartum prescribing and pre-delivery opioid exposure. PRINCIPAL

findingsAmong 361,165 delivery episodes (9.9% cesarean, 90.1% vaginal), PDMP implementation was not associated with changes in postpartum opioid prescribing. In an age-and comorbidity-adjusted analysis by risk groups, PDMP implementation was not associated with statistically significant changes in MME per day per delivery in either low-risk (-0.35; 95% CI, -3.27 to 2.57) or high-risk groups (1.11; 95% CI, -7.46 to 9.68) in the implementation year, and results for pills dispensed, days' supply, and total prescriptions were similarly null, with confidence intervals spanning zero.

conclusionState-level PDMP implementation was not associated with changes in postpartum opioid prescribing. These findings suggest PDMPs alone may be insufficient to influence postpartum prescribing, highlighting the need for alternative strategies to optimize pain management and reduce opioid-related risks.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPostpartum PeriodPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyUnited StatesYoung AdultAnalgesics, Opioidopioid prescriptionPDMPspostpartumstate mandates

Identifiers

PMID42077138
PMCPMC13136944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.