ReviewThe Australasian journal of dermatology2026
A Narrative Review of the Factors Impacting Solid Organ Transplant Recipient Participation in Skin Cancer Screening.
Review in The Australasian journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer-related mortality among solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at a significantly elevated risk of cutaneous malignancy due to the requirement for lifelong immunosuppressive medications. Regular full skin examinations (FSEs) with a specialist clinician are recommended by most guidelines and are critical for early skin cancer detection. However, screening engagement remains variable. This narrative review synthesises the existing literature examining participation in FSEs amongst SOTRs. Seventeen studies were identified and grouped into patient-, clinician- and system-level domains. Across studies, adherence varied between countries and healthcare settings. Patient-level barriers to screening predominantly related to sociodemographic factors. Clinician-level factors that influenced screening practice included guideline awareness and prioritisation of skin cancer risk. At the system level, structured protocols and access to dermatologists improved screening uptake. Identifying and addressing barriers across these domains may improve screening uptake in this at-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.