ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026
Dyadic coping and multiple sclerosis: A qualitative exploration of differences between couples high and low in relationship functioning.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) affects approximately 2.8 million people worldwide. Twenty-five per cent of people with MS report that their romantic relationship is negatively affected by MS. However, partnered individuals with MS also report lower levels of disability, and several studies have found that patient and partner well-being are correlated. Therefore, examining coping with MS from a dyadic perspective is warranted. The objectives of this study were to explore (1) individual and (2) conjoint dyadic coping strategies in couples high and low in relationship functioning.
methodsPeople diagnosed with MS (n = 9) and their partners (n = 9) completed quantitative measures, and purposive sampling was used to recruit couples high and low in relationship functioning. Relationship functioning was operationalized as comprising dyadic satisfaction, cohesion and consensus, consistent with Spanier, 1976, in addition to the degree of illness-related interference within the relationship. Interviews were conducted with each member of the dyad separately, and the results were analysed using thematic analysis and later content analysis.
resultsDifferences were found between high and low relationship functioning couples. High relationship functioning couples generally engaged in more positive coping strategies, such as active engagement, illness acceptance and conceptualizing MS as a shared issue with their partner. Low relationship functioning couples generally engaged in more negative strategies, including avoidance, ineffective communication and conceptualizing MS as an individual issue.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the significant impact that romantic relationships have on the physical and psychosocial well-being of individuals with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.