ArticlePalliative & supportive care2026
Relational-temporal dignity at the end of life: Ethical foundations for the DiRePal model in the algorithmic age.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe increasing presence of artificial intelligence (AI), electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROMs), and digital infrastructures in palliative care is transforming how clinical encounters are organized and how suffering is interpreted. These technological shifts heighten the risk of relational compression and a reduction of dignity to measurable outputs. This paper proposes the DiRePal model (Relational-Temporal Dignity in Palliative Care) as a philosophical framework to re-examine dignity beyond coherent narrative identity or autonomy-centered ethics, emphasizing relational presence, temporal sensitivity, and structural conditions of care.
methodsA philosophical-ethical analysis informed by narrative identity (P. Ricoeur), ethics of alterity (E. Levinas), capabilities theory (M. Nussbaum), and care ethics (J. Tronto). Critical readings of dignity frameworks, AI ethics, and digital health literature were synthesized to develop a relational-temporal account of dignity and 2 operational concepts: the temporal dignity indicator and the architecture of prudence.
resultsWhile digital tools can enhance communication and support anticipatory care, they also risk reducing patients to data profiles, narrowing listening practices, and eroding opportunities for narrative, silence, and relational presence. The DiRePal model reframes dignity as a fluctuating, co-constructed achievement that depends on temporal attentiveness, ethical listening, institutional conditions, and prudent integration of AI and ePROMs. It further expands dignity to include post-biographical dimensions such as memory, grievability, and digital legacy. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsEnd-of-life care in the algorithmic age requires an ethics that recognizes dignity as relational, temporal, and structurally mediated. The DiRePal model offers clinicians and institutions a conceptual grammar to resist technological reductionism, protect time for presence, and safeguard the narrative and post-biographical continuity of persons whose voices may be fragmented, vulnerable, or digitally extended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.