ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2026
Development and validation of a machine learning-based screening tool for early detection of adolescent suicide risk.
Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations in Both Directions Between Internet Gaming Disorder and Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among Chinese Adolescent Gamers: Two-Wave Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Irritable bowel syndrome and suicide risk among adolescents: a prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent suicide remains a significant public health concern, yet existing suicide screening instruments primarily focus on already manifested suicidal phenomena, underscoring the need for reliable and practical tools to enable early identification and intervention.
methodsBased on a large-scale school-based cohort study conducted in Southern China in 2022, this study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate two machine learning-based tools (a 51-item full version and an 11-item abbreviated version) designed to help identify adolescents at risk of developing suicide risk. The dataset was divided into two samples for tool development and longitudinal interview validation. During the tool development phase, LASSO regression was employed to select items with optimal contributions for recent suicide attempts from a multidimensional set of risk factors, followed by model training with multiple machine learning algorithms. The developed models were subsequently evaluated for their ability to predict suicide risk as assessed by the follow-up interview in the longitudinal validation phase.
resultsBoth versions of the screening tool demonstrated adequate discriminative ability, with the CatBoost algorithm outperforming others (AUROC ≥ 0.87). The abbreviated tool showed a slight trade-off between model precision and practicality, with a 0.02 reduction in AUROC, while still maintaining appropriate discrimination. Longitudinal validation using follow-up interview outcomes supported the predictive validity of both tools. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the utility of machine learning-based suicide risk screening tools among adolescents.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence supporting the machine learning-based screening tools for early suicide risk detection in adolescents that integrates multidimensional vulnerabilities. The tools show promise in facilitating early identification and targeted interventions in school settings, addressing a critical need in adolescent mental health care. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to confirm their efficacy and support broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.